When was unrelated incidents written

The poem is spoken by an anchorman interrupting the news by telling abbot his accent. This poem has a interesting theme, his writing and tells about the differences in different cultures and their language This poem talks about accent and race. In the poem there is a anchorman from Glasgow and he talks about how he should not tell the news in an BBC accent but to tell the news in his true self, in his true colours.

He describes that he thinks that the glasgowien accent is the real english from his point of view. He also describe that by speaking in a glasgow accent is not the wrong english nor is it the correct way how to speak english and that there is nothing wrong about that. This poem has some creative writing even though there is no sign of a rhyme scheme. Some people might immediately see that there are a lot of errors in spelling.

When Sujata thinks that she has finally lost her mother tongue she starts to hear it again in her dreams. When the newsreaders reads out the news they read it off of autocue and this is how the poem is set out. The poem is written phonetically and not in Standard English. His poetry, full of social significance, was adapted towards the public in an attempt to give voice to his silent class. Frequently it places the journalist between polarized extremes, and calls that neither-nor position impartial.

It's hard to understand why certain words can be insulting to someone when it may not seem that way to you. We have to ask ourselves, why do we care what other people say and should we censer everything that goes into the public just so people don't get offended? In the article, "You Can't Say That," the author Diane Ravitch talks about how certain words are deleted from books or not shown in films because they could offend certain groups.

In the article, Ravitch argues that although it may seem like we live in a world where anything goes, the truth is, that's not true. Diane does research and gathers a list of more than five hundred words that regularly get deleted from textbooks and tests.

One must closely examine whether to see if what they say is true or if it is not. Homer, for example, spoke ample amount about governing and war yet Socrates uncovers that he never actually governed and was never a leader for any war.

If Homer had known much about these subjects as he had claimed to when he mentioned them, he much rather would have participated in them, leaving behind deeds that he could be admired for instead of just simply talking about them. Consequently, we can conclude that Homer was just a poetic imitator who actually did not know the truth or comprehend the reality but only of the.

If the government would have let the people read books then they still would not have been able to understand them because the literature is based on experiences and passions that do not exist to them. In Brave New World, the people can not read Othello because beatiful things, such as great literature, tend to last; people continue to like them even when the become quite old. A society based on consumerism In the novel everything is very systematic and the people stick to the status quo.

We need not to be let alone. We need to be really bothered once in awhile. Without the tone which creates humour and the strong Scottish accent, the way that the writer interprets his message would be very different and the purpose of the message would disappear. Without the Scottish accent, it would just be a normal poem about a BBC news report, however with the accent it shows that the writer is making fun of the BBC news and us, how we are exposed to believe that news reports are very strange without a specific accent.

The humour and the accent attracts the reader to try understand the meaning of the poem. Unrelated Incidents.